Arthur Reymond vs Clement Tabur Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Apr at 10:44 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Reymond vs C. Tabur

FRA
2
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Reymond 2 - 0 Tabur
They have played 6 sets in total, with Arthur Reymond winning 4 and Clement Tabur winning 2. The last match between Arthur Reymond and Clement Tabur was at the M25 Angers, 27-04-2025, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 2-6 6-2 7-6(3).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Reymond | 2 |
| Tabur | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(F) M25 Angers(04-27-25)
(R1) M15 Madrid(12-02-20)
A. Reymond vs C. Tabur H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $78,000 |
| 53.42% (211-184) | Career Total W/L | 60.24% (303-200) |
| 2 | Clay | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 11 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (2-2) |
A. Reymond vs C. Tabur Match Preview:
When evaluating the strength of tennis players, second serve performance often becomes a focal point. In the last six months, Reymond showed a slight edge, winning 44.91% of points when delivering his second serve, just surpassing Tabur’s performance of 44.72%. A statistic this closely matched raises the question: how does one differentiate the favorite in such a tight match? The answer may lie in the correlation between this stat and the accuracy of match predictions.
As we delve into the return game prowess, Reymond once again edges out closely, having clinched 45.63% of his opponent's second serve points in his recent matches. Tabur isn't far behind with a competitive 45.55%. However, when facing a first serve, Tabur's return game shines with a higher success rate of 27.94% compared to Reymond’s 25%. This can indeed influence who might come out on top in their head-to-head encounters, especially when breaking serves becomes a priority.
In the pressure cooker moments, saving breakpoints can determine the outcome of crucial games. Tabur has shown resilience, safeguarding 56.08% of breakpoints against him, whereas Reymond saved 51.85%. Such stats are instrumental for making in-game betting decisions, especially for fans looking for an edge.
Looking at their broader performance over the last year, both players present almost equivalent winning percentages. Reymond boasts a 57.14% win rate, slightly eclipsed by Tabur’s 57.35%. This balance hints at a potentially tight match ahead. Yet, important differences appear when contrasting their preferred playing surfaces; Reymond has a penchant for clay, with a 59% win rate, in contrast to his 43% on grass. Meanwhile, Tabur dominates on hard courts, winning 67% of his matches, struggling on grass without a win in his sole appearance.
When revisiting past confrontations, Reymond has a slight psychological advantage. Out of the single match played, Reymond emerged victorious, etching a win in a grueling 3:12:0 match duration. Their history includes a deciding set which saw Reymond clinch victory, an advantageous stat if this upcoming match extends to that stage. Even in highly pressurized tiebreak situations, both have shared the spoils equally; experience which could serve as a critical confidence booster during close calls.
When examining the quality of opponents faced in the past year, Tabur has generally been tested more vigorously, engaging with players averaging a rank of 344.24 compared to Reymond’s average opponent rank of 398.6, a potentially telling sign of Tabur's readiness against tougher competitors. Deciding set performances across their respective careers further differentiate these two; Reymond shows a higher propensity to win with 54% victories compared to Tabur's 50%.
Considering all these statistics collectively provides a clearer prediction of the match. While both exhibit skill sets that favor them at different instances in a match, Reymond’s cumulative history and game strengths, especially under decisive conditions, position him as the likely winner of the upcoming encounter.
Arthur Reymond vs Clement Tabur Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Reymond vs C. Tabur H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 34 | Games Won | 31 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:36:29 | Average Match Time | 2:36:29 |
| 58% (125/216) | 1st Serve % | 59% (120/204) |
| 68% (85/125) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (84/120) |
| 54% (49/91) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (36/84) |
| 53% (8/15) | Break Pts Won % | 37% (7/19) |
| 41% (84/204) | Return Points Win % | 38% (82/216) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Reymond Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
C. Tabur Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-7(4) 7-6(6) 7-6(6) | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 7-5 7-5 | ||

A. Reymond vs C. Tabur Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.42% (211/184) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.24% (303/200) |
| 52.42% (476/432) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.96% (666/483) |
| 51.63% (4408/4129) | Games Win/Loss | 53.18% (5759/5071) |
| 47.83% (33/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.15% (86/44) |
| 58.12% (111/80) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.03% (177/113) |
| 50.39% (64/63) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.78% (40/42) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1331 | Aces Total | 1171 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 719 | Total Double Faults | 1149 |
| 1:24:16 | Average Match Time | 1:36:34 |
| 473.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 444.98 |
| 57% (13582/23734) | 1st Serve % | 61% (18751/30789) |
| 68% (9280/13582) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (12622/18751) |
| 51% (5134/10155) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5971/12037) |
| 44% (1000/2293) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1531/3448) |
| 40% (9205/23121) | Return Points Win % | 42% (13335/31431) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 34.33% (23/44) | Challenger W/L | 50.34% (74/73) |
| 57.49% (188/139) | Futures W/L | 65.29% (222/118) |
| 53% (205/386) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (299/497) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 46% (52/114) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (76/135) |
| 53% (68/129) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (83/147) |
| 86% (206/177) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (283/255) |
| 14% (206/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (283/28) |
| 17% (187/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (220/48) |